select ad.sno,ad.journal,ad.title,ad.author_names,ad.abstract,ad.abstractlink,j.j_name,vi.* from articles_data ad left join journals j on j.journal=ad.journal left join vol_issues vi on vi.issue_id_en=ad.issue_id where ad.sno_en='84905' and ad.lang_id='6' and j.lang_id='6' and vi.lang_id='6' Primary versus rescue PCI: why is primary better? | 84905
プロバイオティクスと健康に関するジャーナル

プロバイオティクスと健康に関するジャーナル
オープンアクセス

ISSN: 2155-9880

概要

Primary versus rescue PCI: why is primary better?

Amir momenizadeh, asghar mohamadi

Myocardial infarction is the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in developing country.the two therapeutic strategy for treating myocardial infarction are thrombolytic therapy and primary Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [1]. Some studies demonstrated that primary PCI had significant clinical benefit compared to thrombolytic therapy [2]but owing to primary PCI is not available in some hospitals some patients inevitably are treated by thrombolytic therapy and sometimes thrombolytic therapy failed to provide complete re occlusion and TIMI grade 3 is not achieved and the patients must refer to performed rescue PCI[3].

免責事項: この要約は人工知能ツールを使用して翻訳されたものであり、まだレビューまたは検証されていません。
Top